The Supreme Court of Canada came to a decision this week in a case that asked whether a person can lose their permanent residence status after being convicted of a crime and receiving a conditional sentence – that is, a sentence to be served not in prison but in the community. It also asked whether a person can lose their status for being convicted of a crime that would not have resulted in a loss of status at the time it was committed, but would have by the time an immigration officer examined the case because the maximum sentence had been raised by Parliament. The Court answered “no” to both questions.


Under section 36 of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, a permanent resident may be declared inadmissible – and subsequently removed from the country – for “serious criminality”. The Act defines “serious criminality” as committing a crime that carries a maximum punishment of 10 years’ imprisonment, or a conviction that results in a “term of imprisonment” of more than six months.


The Tran case concerned a permanent resident who had been convicted under the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act for his part in running a marijuana grow op. At the time of the offence, the maximum penalty he could have received was seven years in prison, but by the time he was convicted it had been raised to 14 years. The punishment he was actually given, however, was a 12-month conditional sentence.


The Supreme Court looked at the language and the purpose of the IRPA provision in order to reach a conclusion. Justice Côté, writing for the unanimous panel, decided that “term of imprisonment” must strictly mean time in prison. She reasoned that the Act uses sentencing to determine when a criminal act can be called “serious”, and that a conditional sentence is meant to be a less serious punishment than time in prison, reflecting a lower degree of culpability. If a sentence of five months in prison is more serious than a sentence of 12 months of conditional release, for example, then it wouldn’t be right for the person serving the conditional 12 months to be deported while the person serving five in prison could stay in Canada.


She went on to address the second question by referring to criminal law, where there is a mutual obligation between the state and its citizens: citizens must abide by the law, but the government must be clear about what the laws are, and usually won’t make new laws that apply retrospectively to past events. Similarly, permanent residents must honour their obligation to avoid serious criminality, but they are entitled to know in advance what will be considered “serious” enough to lead to their removal from Canada. Therefore, writes Justice Côté, the relevant time for determining serious criminality is when the offence is committed.


The way that the “serious criminality” provision in the IRPA is constructed means that the line between losing PR status and remaining in Canada can move from time to time, depending on what Parliament decides is a more or less serious crime and what a judge rules in an individual case. But the Tran decision brings more clarity to the rule and a greater degree of predictability for permanent residents.

Borders Law firm

Amit Pandey

We wanted to write sincere thanks to John, Devika and Borders Law firm for the help throughout the process. John was extremely kind and thorough and he counselled with suitable options available for me on migration to Canada, documentation submissions, query resolutions, visa processing and continued personal support and follow up until the last step I am beyond grateful for their kindness and service. I will be using them for any changes to our companies immigration needs going forward. Would recommend this firm for anybody blindly looking for immigration help. They would guide you with complete transparency and professionalism. Thank you once again.

Jehiel Cabrera

If you need a Immigration Law Firm that you can trust, Borders Law Firm is for you. We retained Devika and her team to work on a misrepresentation case. We asked them to help us in a very short period of time (less than a week) but they did an impeccable, impeccable job. They were willing to work and reply to our questions early and off hours and show their dedication to help out. In 2 weeks, we were able to get our work permit. Immigration issues are scary and its easy to feel hopeless but with the right people and resources, there will be a solution. I strongly recommend Devika, she showed a lot of care, very professional, very technical and very smart. You will not regret hiring her, her work is worth it, more than priceless! Special thanks to Hillen, for going above and beyond, making sure that our response letter is accurate and flawless.

Himanshu Bhond

Borders law firm is best immigration consultant and lawyers in Ontario Canada. I suggest you to visit here for best service.

Suresh Bhoopathy

I wish to express my sincere appreciation with the services we received from your law firm. Borders Law Firm provided us with an amazing, valuable resource and experience. I have worked with couple of law firms in the past but the experience with your firm was professional and personal. Frankly speaking, Devika and Phing were available whenever I needed legal help and crisp / precise with the entire process. I have nothing but good things to say about our experience with your firm. Thanks a ton for the best services and continue your great service. Suresh Bhoopathy

See more Google Reviews

Copyright © 2024 Borders Law firm
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.