The U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Service (USCIS) has entered into a settlement agreement in Shergill v. Mayorkas, which allows for L-2 visa holders to maintain work authorization while awaiting USCIS adjudication. USCIS also released a policy alert on 12 November 2021 and updated its policy manual to reflect the changes below. Currently, L2 visa holders (spouses of L1 visa holders) must apply for an employment authorization document (EAD) after arriving in the U.S. to be able to work. L2 visa holders filing to renew their EAD were faced with extensive processing delays, resulting in the expiry of their current EAD, causing them to lose their work authorization for no fault of their own. An action was filed arguing that L2 holders were being prejudiced due to USCIS’s processing delays. The settlement agreement expands L-2 work authorization as follows: Beginning November 12, 2021, the EAD of an E and L dependent spouse, and employment authorization and EAD of an H-4 dependent spouse will be automatically extended for a period of up to 180 days if: The dependent spouse properly filed an Application for Employment Authorization (Form I-765) for a renewal of their E, L, or H-4 dependent spouse-based EAD before the current EAD expired; andThe dependent spouse has an unexpired Form I-94 indicating valid E, L, or H-4 derivative status. Any such automatic extension will terminate automatically on the earlier of: The end of the validity period of the nonimmigrant status, as shown on the Form I-94;The approval or denial of the application to renew the previous EAD using Form I-765; or180 days from the date of the expiration of the previous EAD. In addition, L-2 spouses will be granted work authorization incident to status, meaning they will not require to file a separate EAD application. Their authorization to work will be noted in an updated version of their I-94 travel record. It’s important to note that the new I-94 form has not yet been implemented, with the USCIS committed to amending the form within 120 days of the settlement agreement. In our view, the new automatic work authorization is a major step forward as it eliminates the need for an L2 holder to submit a separate EAD application after arriving in the U.S. The latter reduces unnecessary red tape and increases certainty for spouses of L1 visa holders. While this step forward emerged from a lawsuit, and not from congressional legislative reform, at least the outcome has landed on the right policy setting. Back to all posts Share this post: Facebook-Logo Twitter-Logo Linkedin pinterest Mail-Logo
sapan purewal Devika is the best. She is very knowledgeable and will always give her honest advice. She is very understanding and will put in extra effort if your situation demands so. I highly recommend her for all your immigration needs.
Teresa F. Borders Law Firm is my far the best experience I have had. After consulting and meeting with other immigration lawyers, I really felt confident with this firm. I have worked with Jenny Mao over the past year and I am happy to say that she has helped me out immensely and I am extreme grateful for not only her professionalism, but for her hard work and determination. I highly reccomend Borders Law Firm. From my experience, they are the best in the GTA.
Harmanpreet Singh We have had an excellent experience with Borders Law firm & would like to personally thank Jenny Mao who was handling our application & was extremely prompt in her responses, well versed with the documentation & professional throughout our journey. Would strongly recommend them for a personalized service & vast knowledge on the subject
Chenia Lobo Highly recommend Borders Law firm. Their service was great, extremely professional and always timely. I never had any problem throughout my whole process. So pleased with Jenny & devika and all the work they did.