On January 20, 2025, the Trump Administration issued a series of Executive Orders (EOs) that significantly reshape U.S. immigration policy. These orders focus on border security, rescinding humanitarian programs, increasing visa applicant vetting, and attempting to limit birthright citizenship. Additionally, several executive actions implemented under the Biden Administration have been revoked. Below, we explore the most pressing implications for employers who rely on foreign national talent. Rescission of Biden-Era Executive Orders Several Executive Orders from the Biden Administration aimed at improving employment-based immigration processes were immediately rescinded. One key EO previously directed U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Services (USCIS) to modernize policies by streamlining adjudications, reducing the issuance of Requests for Evidence (RFEs) and Notices of Intent to Deny (NOIDs), and extending validity periods for Employment Authorization Documents (EADs). Its repeal suggests a return to bureaucratic hurdles that may slow immigration processing. Another rescinded EO focused on expanding opportunities for foreign-born STEM professionals, particularly in artificial intelligence (AI). That initiative instructed the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and the Department of Labor (DOL) to create immigration pathways for top global talent. USCIS had begun adjusting policies related to O-1A (extraordinary ability), EB-1 (extraordinary ability), and EB-2 National Interest Waivers (NIW) to attract experts in these fields. The revocation of this EO signals a departure from these talent-attraction efforts. Although these reversals do not immediately alter immigration regulations, they indicate a return to policies that may reduce efficiency and increase scrutiny in employment-based sponsorship cases. Increased Vetting for Visa Applicants One of the new EOs reinstates the Trump Administration’s previous focus on enhanced vetting for individuals seeking U.S. visas, admission, or other immigration benefits. The administration claims that increased security screening is necessary to prevent threats to national security and public safety. Employers and visa applicants should prepare for potential processing delays due to: Additional security-related questions on visa applications. Extended background checks, often referred to as administrative processing. Greater scrutiny of employment-based petitions, likely leading to more RFEs. Potential visa denials based on heightened security concerns. Moreover, within 60 days, federal agencies must review and identify countries that may pose a security risk, which could lead to new travel restrictions or bans similar to those imposed in 2017. Challenges to Birthright Citizenship A newly issued EO titled “Protecting the Meaning and Value of American Citizenship” seeks to reinterpret the 14th Amendment’s birthright citizenship provisions. Historically, individuals born within U.S. borders have automatically acquired citizenship. The new EO attempts to restrict this right to children with at least one U.S. citizen or lawful permanent resident parent. If implemented, this policy would mean that children born in the U.S. to temporary visa holders—including those on employment-based visas—would no longer be granted automatic citizenship. The EO is set to take effect on February 19, 2025, but legal challenges are already underway. Many constitutional scholars argue that such a reinterpretation of the 14th Amendment is unlikely to withstand judicial scrutiny. Additional Measures Impacting Work Authorization The Trump Administration has also introduced two immigration-related EOs, “Securing Our Borders” and “Protecting the American People Against Invasion,” which contain provisions that could significantly impact work authorization for various groups. Key provisions include: Termination of categorical humanitarian parole under the Cuba-Nicaragua-Haiti-Venezuela program established under Biden. Review of Temporary Protected Status (TPS) designations to ensure they are “appropriately limited in scope.” Reassessment of employment authorization policies, with a focus on restricting work eligibility for individuals without legal immigration status. Encouraging voluntary departures of undocumented individuals and increasing detention prior to removal proceedings. Employers with workers who rely on humanitarian programs or TPS designations should prepare for potential disruptions to their workforce. Federal Hiring Freeze and Its Impact on Immigration Processing A separate EO implemented on January 20 places a federal civilian hiring freeze, which could significantly impact immigration case processing. Additionally, another order mandates that all federal employees return to in-office work as soon as feasible. These measures may have the following effects on immigration agencies: If USCIS officers resign or are terminated, their roles cannot currently be backfilled, leading to longer processing times for visa petitions and applications. Many USCIS officers have worked remotely since the COVID-19 pandemic. The new return-to-office mandate could result in further staffing disruptions. When hiring resumes, a wave of new officers with limited experience could lead to inconsistent adjudications and increased errors in immigration decision-making. What Employers Should Do Now Given the broad scope of these immigration changes, employers should take proactive steps to mitigate potential disruptions, including: Assess ongoing and upcoming immigration cases – Expect delays and increased scrutiny, particularly for work visa applications. Plan for additional documentation and compliance measures – Ensure all employment-based sponsorship applications are meticulously prepared to withstand heightened review. Monitor travel risks for employees – Increased vetting and possible new travel restrictions could impact global mobility. Engage legal counsel for strategy – Immigration attorneys can help navigate these evolving policies and implement risk mitigation strategies. Conclusion The Trump Administration’s new immigration policies signal a shift toward stricter enforcement, increased bureaucracy, and a departure from initiatives aimed at attracting global talent. Employers must stay informed and proactive to manage the potential impact on their foreign national employees. While some of these changes are subject to legal challenges, companies should prepare for a more restrictive immigration landscape in the near future. We will continue to share impacts to corporate immigration matters as they are announced by the Trump administration. Back to all posts Share this post:
zay B Borders Law firm has provided our company with excellent immigration services. Highly recommend for those who need help or any companies that need to apply for LMIA in Canada. Devika Penekepelapati has deep and thorough knowledge of rules and procedures . She got a few LMIAs and WP approved for our Company. We would not hesitate to recommend the law firm to anyone seeking help with immigration services. Thanking you sincerely Devika and entire Borders Law firm Team.
Annie Caplan Devika and John were excellent. They understood how this process would change my life and helped me get to the US. John was extremely kind and thorough. When my employer in the US ended up trying to take advantage of me, they helped me transfer my visa to a new employer and had so much empathy for my situation and now I have a job in California that makes me so happy while helping others. I am beyond grateful for their kindness and service. I will be using them for any changes to my status going forward.
Neha K Borders Law firm - Devika OMG where do I start from.... so I got her number from my CA who I have been getting my taxes filed from last ten years. I was not sure what will happen to my mom's files becuase I had already tried four times before and everytime there was something or the other that happened and my application was not accepted... Devika has been my good luck, an angel in my life and a miracle believe it or not. I wish I could give you the details about why it was so so so important for my mom to get this immigration but unfortunately I can't share my personal details but I can tell you all one thing, that Devika and her team not only helped me with my mom's immigration case but also helped me with her super visa extension and all other obstacles we faced. I had no idea that my file can get approved so fast. Today I feel like my dream of having my mom here permanently came true all because of Devika.She is very knowledgeable, super patient, went out of her way to do, spent extra hours assisting me and completing this file. Always understood and heard my issues, with patience. I don't know how many times I cried with her and she always gave me hope and strength to be patient and wait for the approval. Honestly I am very impressed how she adds human touch to her immigration cases and treats the families with so much love and always been very professional as well. Devika is the best, she has an awesome awesome team. I can go on and on and on about her. I always suggest my friends her name and tell them about her services.It feels so good when I give her number to people in need of a good immigration lawyer, because in my heart I know that Devika will be able to help them with their immigration very well.She is the best Thank you Devika for being a great lawyer,a great human being and an angel in my life. Himanshi (Mansi)
Amit Pandey We wanted to write sincere thanks to John, Devika and Borders Law firm for the help throughout the process. John was extremely kind and thorough and he counselled with suitable options available for me on migration to Canada, documentation submissions, query resolutions, visa processing and continued personal support and follow up until the last step I am beyond grateful for their kindness and service. I will be using them for any changes to our companies immigration needs going forward. Would recommend this firm for anybody blindly looking for immigration help. They would guide you with complete transparency and professionalism. Thank you once again.