Two key sections of the travel ban ­– the ban on entry for nationals of the six designated countries and the restrictions on refugees – will not take effect today.  On March 15, 2017, two federal judges issued nationwide temporary restraining orders to block the implementation of U.S. President Trump’s “Executive Order Protecting the Nation from Foreign Terrorist Entry into the United States” before it could come into effect today, March 16.[1]

The first nationwide temporary restraining order (TRO) was issued by United States District Judge Derrick K. Watson at the federal court in Honolulu, Hawaii, in the case State of Hawaii et al. v Trump et al.  The TRO covers not only Section 2 of the Executive Order, which contains the provisions enacting a temporary suspension of entry for nationals of six designated countries (Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria, and Yemen) but also covers Section 6, which includes limits on the U.S. Refugee Admissions Program for the fiscal year 2017.[2]  Judge Watson held that the Executive Order violates the religious establishment clause of the U.S. Constitution, and declared in strong language that “the illogic of the government’s contentions is palpable…It is a discriminatory purpose that matters, no matter how inefficient the execution.”[3]  His decision invoked President Trump’s public comments as evidence of discriminatory purpose.

President Trump’s reaction to the first TRO was to declare that Judge Watson had displayed “unprecedented judicial overreach,” and said that his administration would appeal the ruling to the United States Supreme Court because “[t]he need for my executive order is clear.”[4]

Several hours after Judge Watson issued his order for a TRO, United States District Judge Theodore D. Chuang issued a similar ruling in Maryland.  While he declined to block the entire Executive Order from going into effect, he ruled that Section 2, which aimed to suspend entry into the U.S. for nationals of the six designated countries, could not be enforced.[5]

Therefore for the moment, the travel ban sections barring entry for nationals of the six designated countries and limiting the number of refugees admitted into the United States for the fiscal year 2017 will not come into effect today. While the current TRO is, of course, temporary, it remains to be seen whether the full travel ban will come into effect at a later date.  Judge Watson has stated his intention to hold an expedited hearing to determine whether the nationwide TRO should be extended.[6]  It is therefore possible that if such an extension is granted, and if the legal challenges in Hawaii and Maryland are ultimately successful and upheld on appeal, the Travel Ban 2.0 – a source of unimaginable fear, worry, and anger for so many ­­- may be never take effect at all.

 

The full text of Judge Watson’s order issuing a nationwide Temporary Restraining Order is available online directly from the federal court in Hawaii: http://www.hid.uscourts.gov/files/announcement142/CV17-50%20219%20doc.pdf.

The full text of Judge Chuang’s memorandum opinion and order is available online directly from the federal court in Maryland: http://www.mdd.uscourts.gov/news/international-refugee-assistance-project-et-al-v-donald-j-trump-et-al-tdc-17-0361-2017-03

 

 

 

[1] Alexander Burns, “2 Federal Judges Rule Against Trump’s Latest Travel Ban,” New York Times, March 15, 2017, https://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/15/us/politics/trump-travel-ban.html?hp&action=click&pgtype=Homepage&clickSource=story-heading&module=span-ab-top-region&region=top-news&WT.nav=top-news.

[2] American Immigration Lawyers Association (AILA), “Hawaii District Court Stops Implementation of March 6, 2017 Travel/Refugee Ban,” March 15, 2017, AILA Doc. No. 17020631,  http://www.aila.org/infonet/documents-relating-to-state-of-hawaiis-challenge.

[3] Timothy Hurley, “Trump vows to appeal travel ban ruling by federal judge in Hawaii,” Honolulu Star Advertiser, March 16, 2017, http://www.staradvertiser.com/2017/03/15/breaking-news/hawaii-in-federal-court-to-challenge-trumps-travel-ban/.

[4] Ibid.

[5] Supra, note 1.

[6] Supra, note 3.


Borders Law firm

Abin Abraham

Borders Law firm is one of the best immigration consultants & lawyers in Ontario, Canada. Their way of service is outstanding & Ms.Devika’s service is really appreciable. She will clearly tell the best option that suits you. Special thanks to Jenny, she helped the documentation part in a professional way. I will 100 percentage suggests borders law firm for immigration-related services. Thank you so much for your service.

ravinder kaur

I and my family want to express our sincere thanks and gratitude to Devika, John and the team at Borders Law firm for assisting us with the PRTD application at a time when most processing was closed due to lockdowns. They also worked proactively with us to establish a good strategy with back up plans which gave us sufficient information and assurance. Very responsive and forthcoming with information. Proactive in processing but at the same time they put enough time in the application and the supporting details to have high quality of the application. As a result our application was processed in 1 go at a time when it was critical and sensitive time for the family. Thank you again.

sandeep r

My PR Application was taking long time and finally had a query on my case. That is when I approached Border's Law. Devika and Brendan handled my case very professionally with extra care. I highly recommend this law firm especially when you need that extra help. Thanks Devika and Brendan, you guys were so patient with me :).

Amulya

Excellent Firm..! Always helpful, friendly and honest with their work. My personal thanks to Devika and Yana for providing excellent service. I highly recommend them for any kind of Visa application.

See more Google Reviews

Copyright © 2022 Borders Law firm
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.