In a recent landmark ruling, Canada’s federal court has reaffirmed a critical aspect of procedural fairness in immigration matters. The ruling underscores that Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada (IRCC) officers are not obligated to inform applicants of deficiencies in their applications before rendering a decision. This decision serves as a vital reminder for applicants to approach the process with thoroughness and seek professional guidance to ensure the strongest possible application.

The case in question involved an Iranian citizen aspiring to launch an IT consulting business in the Vancouver area under the International Mobility Program. Despite presenting a comprehensive business plan and legal counsel submissions, the applicant faced challenges during the review process.

The immigration officer highlighted a disparity between the applicant’s proposed initial investment of $138,600 CAD and the demonstrated bank balance of approximately $150,000 CAD. In other words, the total balance of $150,000 was too small to support a transfer of $138,600, which would have left the parent company with insufficient funds. Additionally, the officer raised concerns about the ambitious sales estimates lacking tangible support through contracts or clients. Consequently, the officer concluded that the business plan did not sufficiently demonstrate a significant benefit to Canada and denied the work permit.

Upon seeking judicial review, the applicant contended that the decision was unreasonable and that he had been deprived of procedural fairness. He argued the viability and potential benefit of his business, citing his background, skills, and initial steps taken to implement the plan. Furthermore, he asserted a misunderstanding regarding the evaluation of his expenses, revealing additional assets in Iran worth over $2 million.

The court, however, upheld the officer’s conclusions, emphasizing their transparency, intelligibility, and justifiability based on the evidence provided. The court affirmed the officer’s discretion to consider the applicant’s proposed investment as an unreasonable expense, especially given the lack of reference to the substantial assets in Iran.

Crucially, the ruling clarified that procedural fairness does not mandate officers to inform applicants of application shortcomings or concerns. This places the onus on applicants to present a comprehensive and robust case from the outset, leaving limited opportunity for rectification post-submission.

To navigate this landscape effectively, prospective immigrants are strongly encouraged to consult with experienced immigration attorneys. Legal professionals can offer invaluable insights, identify potential weaknesses in applications, and guide applicants on bolstering their case. As the federal court ruling implies, officers may only be prompted to seek additional information if concerns arise beyond regulatory criteria, credibility, accuracy, or the genuine nature of the information submitted.

Borders Law firm

Khalil Ahmad

I have had a great experience with Borders Law firm through out my son's citizenship and my wife's PR application. Devika, John Yoon, and Brendan are well knowledgeable and always gave the best advice. John Yoon, I can't thank you enough he made sure all the paper work is in order and dealing with 3 different department at the same time at he tail end of my wife's PR application, always there to answer my questions even after hours. John was just wonderful though out I have had a great experience with Borders Law Firm and I would strongly recommend this firm.

Arjun Vegesna

Absolutely delighted with John from this firm with the way he counselled with suitable options available for me on migration to Canada, documentation submissions, query resolutions, visa processing and continued personal support and follow up until the last step. Would recommend this firm for anybody blindly looking for immigration help. They would guide you with complete transparency and professionalism.

Bhumika Kashyap

My husband and I had great experience working with Border Law Firm from beginning to end. They answered all my questions and mention the best option First, to get my husband spousal open work permit approval and Second, to get my permanent residence. I am very thankful to Devika Ma'am and Jenny they give great and detailed advice on each part of your application. They were very professional and punctual at their response throughout the process.

Sarita Chai

Thank you, Thank you, Thank you!! Borders Law Firm has provided us with Excellent Service. Devika Penekelapati, John Yoon, Brendan Sheridan, Emily Gerhard, and Oliver Mao (I hope I did not forget anyone), have worked overtime to help our family get "PR" status. Borders Law Firm, made sure that our applications were filled out correctly and all required information was received on time. Borders Law Firm, has helped us to achieve a New Beginning. Thank you, for all of your help. The Chai Family

See more Google Reviews

Copyright © 2024 Borders Law firm
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.