Bill C-46: Changes to Impaired Driving Convictions

On June 21, Bill C-46: An Act to amend the Criminal Code (offences relating to conveyances) and to make consequential amendments to other Acts, received Royal Assent. Starting on December 18 (the date on which the Bill comes into force), Bill C-46 increases the maximum penalty for impaired driving convictions to 10 years’ imprisonment. This increase in maximum penalty is significant because under section 36(1) of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act (IRPA), an impaired driving conviction (DUI) now constitutes inadmissibility under “serious criminality”. This applies to both impaired driving convictions happening within and outside of Canada.

Section 36(2) Prior to Bill C-46

Prior to Bill C-46, section 36(2) of the IRPA dictated that an impaired driving conviction constituted inadmissibility under “ordinary criminality”. For permanent residents, this meant that their status would have been unaffected by an impaired driving offence conviction in Canada unless there was a sentence of imprisonment for six months or more. Impaired driving convictions outside of Canada would not have impacted permanent residency status.

Under section 36(3)(c) of the IRPA, temporary residents with impaired driving convictions were automatically considered for deemed rehabilitation after 10 years from the conviction.

The reclassification of impaired driving convictions as “serious criminality” will result in severe penalties being imposed against permanent residents convicted of such offences.

Bill C-46’s Impact on Permanent and Temporary Residents

Under Bill C-46, an impaired driving conviction for a permanent resident, regardless of the sentence imposed, would automatically result in a finding of inadmissibility. The permanent resident would face a loss of permanent residency status and deportation from Canada. For example, permanent residents who are first-time offenders and fined for their impaired driving convictions would still have their status revoked and face deportation.

Temporary residents with impaired driving convictions will no longer be automatically considered for deemed rehabilitation after 10 years from the conviction. The only options available would be to apply for criminal rehabilitation or apply for a temporary resident permit.

Furthermore, under s.64 of the IRPA, if the impaired driving conviction was committed outside of Canada or the sentence for an impaired driving conviction in Canada was imprisonment for six months or more, the offender would have no right to appeal to the Immigration Appeal Board.

Recommendations from the Canadian Bar Association

In a submission letter sent to Senate Committee on Legal and Constitutional Affairs on February 27, the Canadian Bar Association suggested two recommendations that would prevent permanent and temporary residents from caught under the “serious criminality” provisions of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act.

Recommendation 1:

a) Amend Bill C-46 to make the maximum penalty for impaired driving offence “10 years less a day” to continue classification under “ordinary criminality”; or

b) Amend the Immigration and Refugee Protection Regulations (IRPR) to include an exception to the 10-year penalty threshold to allow deemed rehabilitation to continue for impaired driving offences not involving serious bodily injury or death;

Recommendation 2:

c) Amend the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act to remove references to impaired driving convictions from outside of Canada as grounds for removing Immigration Appeal Division Appeal rights from a permanent resident.

Next Steps?

Given the harsh and disproportionate impact of Bill C-46 on permanent residents, it seems likely that the Canadian government will work to amend either Bill C-46 or the IRPA/IRPR. We will watch closely to see whether such amendments will happen prior to December 18.


Borders Law firm

Rajvir Singh

We hired Devika mam's service for Judicial Review and they have done a fabulous work for us all the staff is super..oliver who assisted devika mam in our case also done very hard work..we highly recommend BORDERS LAW FIRM in any kind of immigration matters.


I can't thank Devika enough. Devika and team has been very co-operative and active throughout my appliction process. I have had the best experience with BORDERS LAW FIRM. Devika's always given the bestest of the advice and helped making the right choice and decision. Thanks to the team for all their hard work and attention to detail.

Suresh Bhoopathy

I wish to express my sincere appreciation with the services we received from your law firm. Borders Law Firm provided us with an amazing, valuable resource and experience. I have worked with couple of law firms in the past but the experience with your firm was professional and personal. Frankly speaking, Devika and Phing were available whenever I needed legal help and crisp / precise with the entire process. I have nothing but good things to say about our experience with your firm. Thanks a ton for the best services and continue your great service. Suresh Bhoopathy

Harmanpreet Singh

We have had an excellent experience with Borders Law firm & would like to personally thank Jenny Mao who was handling our application & was extremely prompt in her responses, well versed with the documentation & professional throughout our journey. Would strongly recommend them for a personalized service & vast knowledge on the subject

See more Google Reviews

Copyright © 2023 Borders Law firm
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.