Bill C-46: Changes to Impaired Driving Convictions

On June 21, Bill C-46: An Act to amend the Criminal Code (offences relating to conveyances) and to make consequential amendments to other Acts, received Royal Assent. Starting on December 18 (the date on which the Bill comes into force), Bill C-46 increases the maximum penalty for impaired driving convictions to 10 years’ imprisonment. This increase in maximum penalty is significant because under section 36(1) of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act (IRPA), an impaired driving conviction (DUI) now constitutes inadmissibility under “serious criminality”. This applies to both impaired driving convictions happening within and outside of Canada.

Section 36(2) Prior to Bill C-46

Prior to Bill C-46, section 36(2) of the IRPA dictated that an impaired driving conviction constituted inadmissibility under “ordinary criminality”. For permanent residents, this meant that their status would have been unaffected by an impaired driving offence conviction in Canada unless there was a sentence of imprisonment for six months or more. Impaired driving convictions outside of Canada would not have impacted permanent residency status.

Under section 36(3)(c) of the IRPA, temporary residents with impaired driving convictions were automatically considered for deemed rehabilitation after 10 years from the conviction.

The reclassification of impaired driving convictions as “serious criminality” will result in severe penalties being imposed against permanent residents convicted of such offences.

Bill C-46’s Impact on Permanent and Temporary Residents

Under Bill C-46, an impaired driving conviction for a permanent resident, regardless of the sentence imposed, would automatically result in a finding of inadmissibility. The permanent resident would face a loss of permanent residency status and deportation from Canada. For example, permanent residents who are first-time offenders and fined for their impaired driving convictions would still have their status revoked and face deportation.

Temporary residents with impaired driving convictions will no longer be automatically considered for deemed rehabilitation after 10 years from the conviction. The only options available would be to apply for criminal rehabilitation or apply for a temporary resident permit.

Furthermore, under s.64 of the IRPA, if the impaired driving conviction was committed outside of Canada or the sentence for an impaired driving conviction in Canada was imprisonment for six months or more, the offender would have no right to appeal to the Immigration Appeal Board.

Recommendations from the Canadian Bar Association

In a submission letter sent to Senate Committee on Legal and Constitutional Affairs on February 27, the Canadian Bar Association suggested two recommendations that would prevent permanent and temporary residents from caught under the “serious criminality” provisions of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act.

Recommendation 1:

a) Amend Bill C-46 to make the maximum penalty for impaired driving offence “10 years less a day” to continue classification under “ordinary criminality”; or

b) Amend the Immigration and Refugee Protection Regulations (IRPR) to include an exception to the 10-year penalty threshold to allow deemed rehabilitation to continue for impaired driving offences not involving serious bodily injury or death;

Recommendation 2:

c) Amend the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act to remove references to impaired driving convictions from outside of Canada as grounds for removing Immigration Appeal Division Appeal rights from a permanent resident.

Next Steps?

Given the harsh and disproportionate impact of Bill C-46 on permanent residents, it seems likely that the Canadian government will work to amend either Bill C-46 or the IRPA/IRPR. We will watch closely to see whether such amendments will happen prior to December 18.


Borders Law firm

Khalil Ahmad

I have had a great experience with Borders Law firm through out my son's citizenship and my wife's PR application. Devika, John Yoon, and Brendan are well knowledgeable and always gave the best advice. John Yoon, I can't thank you enough he made sure all the paper work is in order and dealing with 3 different department at the same time at he tail end of my wife's PR application, always there to answer my questions even after hours. John was just wonderful though out I have had a great experience with Borders Law Firm and I would strongly recommend this firm.

Avinash Mukka

Extreme professionals in handling all the immigration related issues. Borders Law Firm is a one stop where you needs will be fulfilled,personally i would suggest Borders Law Firm to everyone. Thanks to the BordersLaw Firm Team.

Bhumika Kashyap

My husband and I had great experience working with Border Law Firm from beginning to end. They answered all my questions and mention the best option First, to get my husband spousal open work permit approval and Second, to get my permanent residence. I am very thankful to Devika Ma'am and Jenny they give great and detailed advice on each part of your application. They were very professional and punctual at their response throughout the process.

sandeep r

My PR Application was taking long time and finally had a query on my case. That is when I approached Border's Law. Devika and Brendan handled my case very professionally with extra care. I highly recommend this law firm especially when you need that extra help. Thanks Devika and Brendan, you guys were so patient with me :).

See more Google Reviews

Copyright © 2024 Borders Law firm
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.